Home » GRID INTEGRATION » Wind power contribution... » Capacity credit of wind power » Capacity credit values of wind power

Capacity Credit Values of Wind Power

Despite the variations in wind conditions and system characteristics among the European countries and regions, capacity credit calculations are fairly similar (Giebel, 2005).

For low wind energy penetrations levels, the relative capacity credit of wind power (that is ‘firm’ capacity as a fraction of total installed wind power capacity) will be equal or close to the average production (load factor) during the period under consideration, which is usually the time of highest demand. For Northern European countries, this is winter time and the load factor is typically 25–30 per cent onshore and up to 50 per cent offshore. The load factor determining the capacity credit in general is higher than the average yearly load factor.

With increasing penetration levels of wind energy in the system, its relative capacity credit reduces. However, this does not mean that less conventional capacity can be replaced, but rather that a new wind plant added to a system with high wind power penetration levels will substitute less than the first wind plants in the system. This is illustrated in Figure 6.2, where the relative capacity credit tails off, towards a value depending mainly on the minimum load factor.

Table 6.1 summarises the factors leading to higher or lower levels of capacity credit. 

Figure 6.2, which is based on calculations in the DENA 1 study (DENA 2005), shows the effect on capacity credit of expected improved load factors in Germany, resulting from improved wind power technology (more efficient rotors) and the use of sites with higher wind speeds (offshore).


Table 6.1: Factors Affecting Positively and Negatively the Value of the Capacity Credit of a Certain Amount of Wind Power in the System

Higher capacity credit (per cent) Lower capacity credit (per cent)
Low penetration of wind power High penetration of wind
Higher average wind speed, high wind season when demand peaks Lower average wind speeds
Lower degree of system security High system degree of security
Higher wind power plant (aggregated) capacity factor or load factor (determined by wind climate, plant efficiency and specific rated power per m2) Lower aggregated capacity factor (or load factor) of wind power
Demand and wind are correlated Demand and wind uncorrelated
Low correlation of wind speeds at the wind farm sites, (often related to large size of area considered) Higher correlation of wind speeds at wind farm sites; smaller areas considered
Good wind power exchange through interconnection Poor wind power exchange between systems




Figure 6.2: Relationship of Installed Wind Power and Capacity Credit in Germany

Figure 6.2 Relationship of installed wind power and capacity credit in Germany, Source: DENA 2005

Source: DENA (2005)

Wind power thus displaces conventional capacity in the system. The fraction of wind power that displaces conventional capacity may be limited, but the corresponding absolute capacities are significant. The aggregated capacity credit of the wind power plants in a system depends on many factors. Major decisive factors depend on the considered power system (reliability level and flexibility of the generation mix) and the penetration level of wind power in the system. Other factors are related to wind and wind technology, such as the average capacity factor and the geographical dispersion of wind plants in the system. The relative capacity credit decreases from a value approximately equal to the load factor at high load (25-35 per cent) for low penetrations, to approximately 10-15 per cent at high penetrations.

Although wind power has a capacity credit both physically and technically, this characteristic currently has no value in the power market as wind power producers are not generally rewarded for providing firm capacity in the system.

  Acknowledgements | Sitemap | Partners | Disclaimer | Contact

coordinated by


supported by

Intelligent Energy Europ

The sole responsibility for the content of this webpage lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Communities. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that maybe made of the information contained therein.