MAIN PUBLICATION :

• APPENDIX
• ABREVIATIONS
• GLOSSARY
• REFERENCES
• EVENTS

Drive train trends

Bearing arrangements

A wide variety of rotor bearing arrangements has been tried within the context of the established conventional drive train, with multiple stage gearbox and high speed generator.  The basic requirement is to support rotor thrust and weight, whilst communicating only torque to the gearbox.  Early highly modular drive trains, with well separated twin rotor bearings and a flexible connection to the gearbox, could achieve this.  However, especially with the increase in turbine size, there has been increasing interest in systems that reduce weight and cost of the overall system.  A large single slew ring type bearing has been employed in the V90 as the main rotor bearing.  Two and three point bearing systems are adopted in many designs, with no clear sign of consolidation of design choices.  The general trend towards more integrated nacelle systems means that bearing designs are highly interactive with the complete systems concept.  This is substantially true for the conventional drive train and even more so for direct drive and related concepts.

Direct drive and Permanent Magnet Generator (PMGs)

There has been a significant trend towards innovative drive train systems, and direct drive or hybrid systems with reduced gearing figure in many new designs.  Table 3.2 shows direct drive turbines commercially available in the wind energy market.  Enercon has long pioneered direct drive and is the only company with a large market share delivering this technology.  

Design trends are now predominantly towards PMGs and the design struggle is to realise the potentially better efficiency and reliability of a direct drive system without cost or weight penalties.  It may be noted that trend towards PMG technology is much wider than in the context of direct drive alone.  Clipper Windpower (after research into systems with multiple induction generators), Northern Power Systems (after initially adopting a wound rotor direct drive design) and GE Energy in their recent 2.5 XL series, have all adopted PMG systems.  

Table 3.2 Direct drive wind turbines

Direct Drive Turbines
Turbine	Diameter [m]	Power [kW]
ENERCON E-112	114.0	4500
ENERCON E-70 E4	71.0	2300
Harakosan (Zephyros) Z72	70.0	2000
ENERCON E-66	70.0	1800
MTorres TWT 1650/78	78.0	1650
MTorres TWT 1650/70	70.0	1650
VENSYS 70	70.0	1500
VENSYS 77	77.0	1500
Leitwind LTW 77	77.0	1350
VENSYS 64	64.0	1200
VENSYS 62	62.0	1200
Leitwind LTW 61	61.0	1200
ENERCON E-58	58.0	1000
ENERCON E-48	48.0	800
Jeumont J53	53.0	750
Jeumont J48	48.0	750
ENERCON E-33	33.4	330
Subaru 22/100 (FUJI)	22.0	100
Northern Power NW 100/19	19.1	100
Unison U50 750 kW	50.0	750

The Unison U50 750 kW wind turbine (Figure 3.23) is among recent designs emerging in east Asia that endorse the direct drive PMG concept.  The PMG is overhung down wind of the tower balancing the rotor weight and giving the nacelle its characteristic shape.

Figure 3.23 Unison U50, source Unison

Hybrid

Designs with one or two stages of gearing, but not involving high speed two or four pole generators are classified here as ‘hybrid’.  Such designs of Clipper Wind, WinWinD and Multibrid are reviewed in Alternative Drive Train Configurations.  These designs also maintain the trend towards PMG technology.

Fully rated converters

The DFIG route was discussed in Speed Variation.  It has been predominant and will probably endure for some time in the high volume markets of Asia, for example, but is being challenged by more stringent network requirements, efficiency benefits of PMG technology and advances in power converter technology.